LIVE
ARC Raiders player banned 30 days after killing TheBurntPeanut, and Embark won't say why /// Battlefield 6 x Dead Space: Convergence is live until 10 Nov, with 16-player PvE at Area 51 /// The Wolf Among Us Remastered lands 29 Oct: Episode 1 is a free demo on Steam now /// A Game About Digging A Hole Together: 4-player co-op, 4 Dec, day one on Game Pass /// NZ First promises to double the game dev rebate to 40%, cap up to $10m /// New: the release schedule. Every big game, month by month, at getrekt.com/release-schedule /// Cyberpunk: Edgerunners 2 hits Netflix 20 Oct /// Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 lands 23 Oct ARC Raiders player banned 30 days after killing TheBurntPeanut, and Embark won't say why /// Battlefield 6 x Dead Space: Convergence is live until 10 Nov, with 16-player PvE at Area 51 /// The Wolf Among Us Remastered lands 29 Oct: Episode 1 is a free demo on Steam now /// A Game About Digging A Hole Together: 4-player co-op, 4 Dec, day one on Game Pass /// NZ First promises to double the game dev rebate to 40%, cap up to $10m /// New: the release schedule. Every big game, month by month, at getrekt.com/release-schedule /// Cyberpunk: Edgerunners 2 hits Netflix 20 Oct /// Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 lands 23 Oct
PS5 + Xbox SeriesGrand Theft Auto VI-d--h--m--s→
Community
ARC Raiders

He Killed TheBurntPeanut in ARC Raiders, Got Banned, and Peanut Got a “Cheater” Refund. Embark Won’t Say Why

A regular player says he got a 30-day ban the morning after killing ARC Raiders' biggest streamer. The next day, Peanut said he got his gun back because he "died to a cheater". Embark won't say why.

21 October 2026 GetRekt News Desk
He Killed TheBurntPeanut in ARC Raiders, Got Banned, and Peanut Got a “Cheater” Refund. Embark Won’t Say Why
TL;DR
>>

Steve, "Uncle Cheese", killed TheBurntPeanut on Pendola Pass on 12 October and looted his three-day-grind Amplified Kettle. He was banned for 30 days the next morning.

>>

The ban notice gave no reason. The appeal, with footage, was denied on 19 October with only "anti-cheat detected unauthorized behavior".

>>

On 13 October, Peanut said on stream he'd got the Kettle back because he "died to a cheater". That's Embark's automatic refund for unfair-play kills.

>>

Gimmick's unblurred match clock made it look like sniping, and the brothers use the same clock to sync three recordings and argue they never went looking for Peanut.

>>

Our take: cheaters get permanent bans now, so why only 30 days? Both streams are public, so somebody at Embark just has to press play.

Here’s a story that’ll make you think twice before you dome a famous streamer. An ARC Raiders player called Steve, “Uncle Cheese” to his family, says he killed TheBurntPeanut on Pendola Pass on 12 October. The next morning he had a 30-day ban. The notice didn’t say what for, his appeal was denied, and Embark still won’t tell him what he did.

His brother, who runs the small YouTube channel Meet Dadbot, has gone full true-crime on it. His 37-minute video lines up their own recording against both Peanut’s and his duo partner Gimmick’s streams, second by second. It’s pulled around 60,000 views in a day, and #FreeUncleCheese is doing the rounds.

The fight

Steve and his brother describe themselves as two “slightly above average” dads who live about 3,000 miles apart. ARC Raiders is how they hang out a couple of nights a week. On 12 October they were playing duos on Pendola Pass, the new map from the Frozen Trail update. In their words, duos lobbies are shoot-on-sight, and that one was full of flares.

After winning one fight, they heard another duo fighting ARC bots behind them. Two raiders came running across an open field towards them, and Steve dropped one. Then they heard a voice they’d only ever heard on YouTube:

“Please don’t kill me. Please… I’m going to look like a total [coward] if you guys kill me.”

It was Peanut, with Gimmick (Hey You Video Game) along for the ride. The brothers admit they “had a little fun” with a downed Peanut before Steve finished him off. His brother is honest about it: it wasn’t nice. But not nice and against the rules are two different things.

Then Steve opened Peanut’s bag and found a fully upgraded Amplified Kettle with X-Rounds. Earlier on his own stream, Peanut had been calling it a level five. Amplified weapons are Frozen Trail’s new endgame grind. You need a level 4 Outpost, a Gunsmith and Research Station at level 4 (the Gunsmith upgrade needs an Emperor Modulator) and an Amplification Module from the Frigate or the fallen Emperor. Peanut’s own words on stream, after losing it: “I spent three days acquiring this weapon… 3 days and gone in 2 seconds.” He never got to shoot another raider with it.

To be fair, the brothers didn’t get away with it either. The lobby swarmed them and they both died about ten minutes later. Peanut’s Kettle was lost with them. Steve then logged off to go to a comedy show. That was his only match of the day.

The ban

  • 13 October: Steve logs in to a 30-day suspension. Per the video, there was no reason, no clip and no rule cited. Meanwhile Peanut’s chat is calling him a cheater and a stream sniper.
  • When he first tried to appeal, the support site was down.
  • The reason Embark gave: once he did appeal, Embark said its anti-cheat “detected unauthorized behavior”. Steve asked what that behaviour was and whether anyone had watched the footage they sent.
  • 19 October: “Under careful review, this ban will remain in place.” Case closed, and neither question was answered.

The receipt: Peanut got his gun back

This is the part that turns a hunch into something more. On his stream on 13 October, the day Steve’s ban landed, Peanut said:

“I just got my amplified kettle with X-Rounds back ’cause I died to a cheater. No joke.”

That matters because of how ARC Raiders handles cheaters. Since launch, Embark has automatically refunded the loadout of anyone killed by a player its anti-cheat later acts against, no report needed, with an in-game mail saying your items were lost “due to unfair play”. So if Peanut got a refund, something in Embark’s system marked whoever killed him as an unfair-play kill.

The video goes one step further. It points out that every Kettle Peanut rebuilt that night had a gold stock, while the one Steve looted had a purple stock. Their claim is that the refunded gun was the one Steve took. We haven’t checked that frame by frame ourselves, but if it’s right, Embark’s system treated Steve’s kill as cheating.

Their case that it wasn’t stream sniping

First, why it looked like sniping. Peanut blurs his match clock and lobby code on stream so snipers can’t find him. Gimmick didn’t. Both chats spent the match warning him to hide them, and then two strangers came over the hill and took Peanut’s prized gun. As the video admits: “If I were Peanut, I would think I got sniped, too.”

But Gimmick’s unblurred clock is also what let them sync all three recordings, and they reckon it clears them:

  • They never moved towards Peanut. For the first four minutes Peanut and Gimmick stood still nearby, testing a glitch. That would have been the perfect time to snipe them. The brothers were watching a different fight instead. Their post-match map shows they stayed around their spawn area, and the streamers came to them.
  • Every move was a reaction. The “fight behind us” the brothers mention on their recording lines up exactly with Peanut fighting ARC bots on his stream. You can hear them guessing that the other duo blamed them for it.
  • The streamers ran across an open field. Peanut and Gimmick even said in their own post-game chat that they needed to be sneakier in duos.
  • They weren’t sure it was him. After the fight they were asking each other whether it was really Peanut. The brother only watched Peanut’s VOD that night to find out.
  • Steve was genuinely surprised by the Kettle. Peanut had talked about it on stream for ages. A sniper would have known exactly what was in that bag.
  • The brother went for Gimmick’s loot, through a crossfire, for a Pharaoh and a Stitcher that Gimmick had already announced on stream. That’s not something you’d risk if you’d been watching.
  • The brother wasn’t banned. He was in the same match and the same fight. Only Steve’s name came up on both streams when he downed them, and someone in chat suggested looking up their IDs.

So who hit the button?

Nobody knows, and the video is careful not to accuse anyone. It lists three possibilities: Peanut reported him, Gimmick reported him, or a stream chat with thousands of viewers and Steve’s name on screen did. Mass reports like that could look like a pattern to an automated system. On stream, neither Peanut nor Gimmick says they reported anyone.

The video also plays a clip from Peanut’s 13 October stream. In it, Peanut says the devs are “kind of on it” with the people giving him trouble, and that “they’ve been texting me every day, making sure everything’s on”. It might have been a bit. But it shows the gap: a top streamer has ways to reach Embark that a regular player with a support form doesn’t.

What Embark’s rules say

Embark’s own Ban and Enforcement Policy says it will tell you the “enforcement reason” if you appeal. But it says it “cannot offer specific details about what caused the ban” in order to protect its anti-cheat. So “we won’t tell you why” isn’t a one-off brush-off. It’s the policy. The same page lists stream sniping as a bannable offence, and warns that external software can trigger the anti-cheat “even unintentionally”.

The bit that really doesn’t add up

On 30 September, Embark announced that anyone caught cheating now gets a permanent ban, first offence included, with no warnings. So which is it? If the anti-cheat really caught Steve cheating, why only 30 days? And if it wasn’t cheating, why did Peanut get a “you died to a cheater” refund? Either the system flagged a kill it wasn’t sure about and Embark split the difference, or something else is going on. Either way, the person being punished isn’t allowed to know which.

It’s not the first time

  • 2018, Fortnite: Ninja accused a player named IcyFive of stream sniping and said he’d get him banned. IcyFive posted his own footage, and Epic cleared him for lack of evidence.
  • January, ARC Raiders: after Peanut threatened to quit over cheaters stream-sniping him, the cheaters in question were permanently banned. Fellow streamer Thump claimed it happened within 30 minutes. Good riddance to them, but fans noticed how fast it was.
  • Tfue: the streamer got a 30-day ban with no clear reason, then was reportedly unbanned within a day. Regular players weren’t impressed.
  • February: during the duplication glitch saga, Peanut said he only got a warning for duping on stream. Regular players reported losing coins or getting suspended for the same thing.
  • March: players using accessibility controllers, including one who plays with his mouth, were hit with bans until Embark stepped in.
  • March: streamer Peach went to Embark and got a player called NessieDoes a 30-day “harassment” ban after he killed her in two separate matches. He posted a video showing the encounters were random, and the ban was lifted. It’s the same length of ban, and the same streamer-versus-regular-player setup.

What we can’t verify

  • We haven’t seen Embark’s ban notice or appeal emails ourselves. The quotes come from the video and its description.
  • We haven’t independently checked the gold-versus-purple stock comparison, or every second of the three-way sync.
  • We don’t know who reported Steve, if anyone, or whether a human was involved before the ban.
  • It’s possible the ban is for something else entirely, like software on Steve’s PC that Embark’s anti-cheat didn’t like. The video says it’ll post a follow-up if that turns out to be the case.

Our take

Credit to Peanut: he’s an entertainer who dies dozens of times a night, and from his side of the screen it looked exactly like sniping. We’d have thought the same. The video goes out of its way to say “no hard feelings, man” too. This isn’t on him.

It’s on the system. ARC Raiders is a game built on getting jumped by strangers and losing your best gear. That’s the whole thrill. If killing the wrong person on a hillside gets you flagged as a cheater, the rule isn’t “don’t cheat” anymore. It’s “don’t do it to someone famous”.

And the fix is embarrassingly simple. Both streams of this fight are public, and one of them has a match clock right there on screen. A bloke lined them up in an afternoon with a free caption tool and a cup of coffee. Embark had the footage, an appeal and two direct questions, and its answer was a form letter. Nobody is asking Embark to give away its anti-cheat secrets. Tell a banned player which rule they broke, have a human actually press play on the footage, and say they did. Overcorrecting isn’t fixing. Checking is.

Have you been banned in ARC Raiders without being told why? Tell us in the comments or in the GetRekt Discord. If you think Steve deserves a real review, share the video and tag @ARCRaidersGame and @EmbarkStudios. Keep it civil, though. The brothers have asked everyone to be kind to Peanut, Gimmick and Embark’s staff, and so are we.

Sources

Comments 0

  1. No comments yet. Be the first.

Quick check before we post that

More news

All news →